Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rory McRory Fitzrory

Rory McRory Fitzrory's Journal
Rory McRory Fitzrory's Journal
January 3, 2019

Message auto-removed

January 3, 2019

Warren: The Democratic Party is going to say 'no' to the billionaires

Source: THE HILL

BY TAL AXELROD - 01/02/19 10:29 PM EST

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said Wednesday that the Democratic Party should say "no to the billionaires."

Warren, during an appearance on MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show," called on the party to disavow billionaire 2020 presidential candidates "whether they are self-funding" or funding Political Action Committees (PACs).

“Is this going to be a Democratic primary that is funded by the grassroots, that is done with grassroots volunteers, or is this going to be something that’s just one more plaything that billionaires can buy?” Warren asked.

“So I think this is a moment for all of the Democratic nominees to come into the race to say ‘in a Democratic primary we are going to link arms and we’re going to say grassroots funding. No to the billionaires. No to the billionaires whether they are self-funding or whether they are funding PACs. We are the Democratic Party and that’s the party of the people,’" she continued. "That’s how we not only win elections, that’s how we win movements that make real change.”

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/423627-warren-the-democratic-party-is-going-to-say-no-to-the-billionaires



Uh-oh, do I detect a whiff of purity here?


January 2, 2019

Slate: Climate Change Should Kill the Act of God

By KYLE PISCIONIERE
JAN 02, 2019 7:30 AM

Climate change keeps challenging our understanding of, well, everything. Carolyn Merchant and Bill McKibben famously argued that our quaint ideas of nature are dead. But nature was only one of climate change’s early victims. Other deceased include rationality and, in smaller terms, the way “we” use language.

But there’s one thing that climate change should kill: the act of God.

This isn’t a theological discussion; the term has actual legal meaning. Act of God provisions protect parties from being held responsible for “unpredictable and unpreventable” circumstances, usually extreme acts of weather like hurricanes, earthquakes, and lightning. They get written into insurance policies, business contracts, and foundational American environmental legislation like the Clean Water Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act.

Broadly, two criteria qualify an event as an act of God: 1) No human agency could have stopped the event, and 2) no human agency could have exercised due care to prevent or avoid the event’s effects. In other words, acts of God must be unpredictable, and their damage must be unpreventable. On that basis alone, the act of God is nearly obsolete, or at least it should be. While specific weather events such as hurricanes or fires may seem to be acts of God, our growing knowledge of climate systems challenges any vision of weather divorced from human activity. Humans meddle with the climate, which meddles with weather, and the two can’t be disentangled.

But legislators haven’t yet caught on. They’re stuck with a centuries-old precedent built on outdated understandings of nature. While no one person can be held legally responsible for causing a specific hurricane, it’s just wrong to say that weather events are uncaused or unpreventable by human activity—aka human agency. We can’t prevent all weather, but human action could have prevented the cataclysmic droughts, fires, and floods that lurk in the near future. The public now knows who triggers the growing spate of hurricanes, floods, and extinctions, and it is not God. Scientists have been warning the public about human-caused climate change for decades. In fact, the act of God’s obsolescence is just one symptom of a deeper disease. Our legal and intellectual frameworks have not kept pace with our understanding of the climate.

https://slate.com/technology/2019/01/act-of-god-climate-change-legal-environmental-defense.html


Likely Trump Voter Reaction: "See? I toldja it weren't God! It was a act o' SATAN!"
January 1, 2019

2019: The Year of "Blade Runner"

And yet there are no flying cars, no off-world colonies, no attack ships heading for Orion, and no Replicants.

It's something I refer to as Fast-Forward Future Syndrome, in which a movie, TV series, novel, etc., features a setting not far into the future wherein humanity has nonetheless made centuries of progress. 2001: A Space Odyssey and its quasi-sequel 2010 both suffer from it, as does the Planet of The Apes remake starring Mark Wahlberg, set in 2029. The year 2032 is the setting for Demolition Man, where characters refer to the 1990s as Ancient Times!

Books and TV haven't fared much better (remember Space: 1999?) Even Jem, one of my favorite sci-fi novels, is guilty of this sin, as is Ben Bova's Millennium, another great read.

There are many, many more examples that I can't think of right now, cuz I haven't gone to bed yet and am shitfaced. If anyone here can refresh my memory, I would greatly {hiccup!} appreciate it. Happy New Year to all.

Profile Information

Name: Rory
Gender: Male
Hometown: Fredericksburg, VA
Home country: U.S.
Member since: Sun Dec 30, 2018, 07:04 PM
Number of posts: 23
Latest Discussions»Rory McRory Fitzrory's Journal